McLeod

McLeod v. Boone

Good Law
83 F.2d 457·1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 2554
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 1936No. 8104California350 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wilbur, J.

An appeal was allowed by the District Court from its order sustaining a decision of the referee which approved the petition of Dan Boone that he be substituted as claimant pro tanto to the allowed claims of each of certain creditors, including appellants, to the total amount of $3,621.79, segregated in proportion to the several amounts of the allowed claims whose claimants had consented thereto. This amount represented money expended by Dan Boone for the benefit of these creditors before the initiation of the bankruptcy proexeding. The appeal having been docketed in this court, motion was made by the appellants for diminution of the record. Upon the hearing of this motion, this court, deeming its jurisdiction doubtful, requested counsel to file briefs upon the question of whether or not the allowance of appeal by the district judge gave this court jurisdiction of the appeal. It is conceded in these briefs that the question depends upon whether the order appealed from was made in a proceeding in bankruptcy or whether it was made in a controversy in bankruptcy. 11 U.S.C.A. §§ 47 , 48.

The order of the referee approved by the court merely gave effect to the consent of the creditors…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.