William Anell and Ardith Anell v. Freeport Minerals Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, William Anell and Ardith Anell v. Freeport Minerals Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Basic, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation

56 F.3d 70 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William ANELL and Ardith Anell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FREEPORT MINERALS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellees. William ANELL and Ardith Anell, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. FREEPORT MINERALS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant, Basic, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-15687, 93-15787. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1995. Decided May 31, 1995. Before CUMMINGS, * SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William and Ardith Anell appeal the dismissal of their complaint. Due to a slew of late voluntary dismissals of parties only one defendant, Basic, Inc., and one claim, a Sherman Act violation, remain in this appeal. Defendant cross-appeals for sanctions. We have jurisdiction, and we affirm. I. 3 The district court dismissed plaintiffs' complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We review this dismissal…