Willie L. Baker, Jr. v. J. M. Ratelle

Good Law
56 F.3d 70·1995 WL 306865·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19899
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 199594-56295California230 words

Opinion

Opinion

56 F.3d 70 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Willie L. BAKER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. M. RATELLE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-56295. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 18, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Willie L. Baker, Jr., a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal with prejudice of his amended 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 complaint for failure to comply with the pleading requirements set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed July 28, 1994. 3 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4. Baker's motion for an extension of time to submit a brief stating why oral argument is necessary is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.