Kenneth R. Brydon v. George Ingle

56 F.3d 70 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kenneth R. BRYDON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. George INGLE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-16443. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 2, 1995. * Decided May 5, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California prisoner Kenneth R. Brydon appeals pro se the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition brought under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 . Brydon contends that his due process rights were violated when the Board of Prison Terms (Board), acting en banc, rejected the decision of a three-member panel of the Board to grant Brydon parole. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Secs. 1291 , 2253. We review de novo the district court's denial of a habeas corpus petition, see Adams v. Peterson, 968 F.2d 835, 843 (9th Cir. 1992) (en banc), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 1818 (1993), and affirm. 3 Brydon contends that the Board's proposed decision became a…