Frederick Jensen v. Janet Reno, Attorney General

56 F.3d 71 75 A.F.T.R.2d 95 -2416 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frederick JENSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35740. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 19, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frederick G. Jensen appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his complaint alleging wrongful levy by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") on Jensen's Dean Witter investment account. Jensen contends that he should not be obligated to pay federal income tax based on his opposition to the federal government's protection of the right to abortion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Jensen's contention that he should not have to pay income taxes because of his opposition to abortion fails. Attempts by taxpayers to restrict the Government's use of their tax-payments have been…