Douglas G. Housley v. Rodney Hageman Malcom Harris, Richard Stolitz, Anthony L. White, William Maddox and Charles Lutz

Good Law
56 F.3d 71·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19856
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 199594-15421California83 words

Opinion

56 F.3d 71w NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Douglas G. HOUSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rodney HAGEMAN; Malcom Harris, Richard Stolitz, Anthony L. White, William Maddox and Charles Lutz, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15421. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION