Raymond Dobard v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District

56 F.3d 71 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Raymond DOBARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-17293. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 19, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raymond Dobard appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim of his civil rights action against defendant Bay Area Rapid Transit ("BART") which he brought under the Americans With Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq., the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 794 , and the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1985 . We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Dobard also appeals the district court's denial of his two Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. A. Appellate Jurisdiction 3 We lack jurisdiction over the underlying judgment…