In re Glaser

Good Law
56 F.3d 71·1995 WL 309183·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19851
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 199593-56617California659 words

Opinion

Opinion

56 F.3d 71 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Edward Joseph GLASER, Debtor. Edward Joseph GLASER, Appellant. v. Edwina E. DOWELL, Chapter 13 Standing Trustee, Appellee. Edward Joseph GLASER, Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES HOMEOWNER AID, INC., Appellee. No. 93-56617. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 6, 1995. * Decided May 19, 1995. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges and TANNER, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 The bankruptcy court issued an order nunc pro tunc annulling the automatic stay in Edward Glaser's bankruptcy proceeding. We affirm the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's (BAP) decision upholding that order. 4 The parties are familiar with the facts of the case; we will not recite them here. We review de novo decisions of the BAP. In re Johnston, 21 F.3d 323, 326 (9th Cir. 1994). We and the BAP review de novo the bankruptcy court's conclusions of law and examine its finding of facts for clear error. Id. 5 Section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.