General Electric Railcar Services Corporation, a New York Corporation v. Barry Rickert
Opinion
Opinion
56 F.3d 71 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. GENERAL ELECTRIC RAILCAR SERVICES CORPORATION, a New York corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barry RICKERT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-56263. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 9, 1995. Decided May 23, 1995. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing Aug. 1, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Central District of California, D.C. No. CV-92-02676-AAH; A. Andrew Hauk, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. REVERSED. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Defendant-Appellant Barry Rickert appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee General Electric Railcar Services Corporation ("GE"). The district court found Rickert personally liable to GE for Image South's breach of contract and conversion of GE's property, and awarded GE damages in the amount of $482,325.23 plus costs, attorneys'…