Camellia A. Mullins v. Campbell Soup Co., and Chester Powell

56 F.3d 72 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Camellia A. MULLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAMPBELL SOUP CO., and Chester Powell, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-56492. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 3, 1995. * Decided May 18, 1995. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON, and CANBY, Circuit Judges; TANNER, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Camellia Mullins, appearing pro se, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment dismissing Mullins' claims for tortious discipline and sexual harassment under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA"), Cal. Gov't Code Secs. 12900 et. seq., and various state law claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec.1291 , and we AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND for trial. BACKGROUND FACTS 4 Plaintiff was initially hired by Campbell Soup Co. in February 1988 as an Assistant Deli Manager in its Institutional Food Services Division in Denver, Colorado. Chester Powell was the…