Emmett M. Oliver v. San Francisco Police Department Charles Siani Geoffrey Williams and Marty Lalor

56 F.3d 72 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Emmett M. OLIVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT; Charles Siani; Geoffrey Williams and Marty Lalor, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15314. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 19, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Emmett M. Oliver, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action against Officers Charles Siani, Geoffrey Williams, Marty Lalor and the San Francisco Police Department ("defendants") alleging that defendants violated his civil rights by submitting a false police report and committing perjury at his criminal trial. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion, Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S. Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992), and we affirm. 3 Oliver contends…