911 Emergency Services, Inc. v. Sacramento Regional Fire/EMS Communications Center

56 F.3d 72 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 911 EMERGENCY SERVICES, INC., dba American Medical Response of Sacramento Valley, a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SACRAMENTO REGIONAL FIRE/EMS COMMUNICATIONS CENTER, a local public entity; Sacramento County Fire Protection District, a local public entity; Courtland Fire Protection District, a local public entity; Fair Oaks Fire Protection District, a local public entity, Defendants, and City of Sacramento, a local public entity, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-15224. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 10, 1995. Decided May 23, 1995. Before: CUMMINGS * , SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 911 Emergency Services, Inc., doing business as American Medical Response of Sacramento Valley ("AMR"), appeals an order of the district court denying its motion for a preliminary injunction against the City of Sacramento. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. Sec.…