Charles Michael Martin v. State of Arizona Department of Corrections, Defendants-Apellees

56 F.3d 72 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles Michael MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants-Apellees. No. 94-15378. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 18, 1995. * Decided May 30, 1995. Before: CHOY, SNEED, and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles Martin, a former Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action. Martin contends that the district court erred by: (1) denying his motions for court-appointed counsel; and (2) finding that he had failed to demonstrate the defendants' deliberate indifference to his safety. 3 * Martin filed his Sec. 1983 civil rights action alleging that the Arizona Department of Corrections ("the ADOC") and the four named defendants - Samuel Lewis, Director, ADOC; John McFarland, Assistant Director, ADOC; John Avenenti, Deputy…