Deo Narayan v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
56 F.3d 72·1995 WL 314605·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19834
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 199593-70842California346 words

Opinion

Opinion

56 F.3d 72 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Deo NARAYAN, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70842. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 6, 1995. Decided May 22, 1995. Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, INS No. Aqb-toy-vbr. INS GRANTED AND REVERSED. Before: BRUNETTI, THOMPSON, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges: 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Narayan petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) order denying his motion for reconsideration of an order dismissing as untimely his appeal from a judgment denying his petition for stay of deportation proceedings. The Immigration Judge (IJ) denied his stay petition on November 12, 1992. Narayan's counsel mailed his notice of appeal on November 23, 1992. Because Narayan's counsel mailed the notice, the immigration regulations gave her until November 25 for the notice to be filed with the IJ's office. 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.