Maryland Hotel, Ltd. v. Hotel Corporation Of The Pacific

Good Law
56 F.3d 72·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19877
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 199594-15063California1,268 words

Opinion

Opinion

56 F.3d 72 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. MARYLAND HOTEL, LTD., a California Corporation; Majestic Inn, Ltd, a California Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. HOTEL CORPORATION OF the PACIFIC, a Hawaii Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Nos. 93-17345, 94-15063. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 13, 1995. Decided May 12, 1995. Before: GIBSON * , GOODWIN, and HUG, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Hotel Corporation of the Pacific ("Hotel Corp.") appeals the district court's impositions of sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 for submission of a false declaration. Maryland Hotel, Ltd. and Majestic Inn, Ltd. ("Maryland Hotel") cross-appeal the district court's denial of attorney's fees incurred in pursuing sanctions. I. BACKGROUND 3 The underlying litigation arose when Maryland Hotel sued to compel arbitration of a dispute over a management agreement with an entity known as Hotel Corp. or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.