Marvin A. McNatt v. Allied-Signal, Inc., Richard A. Graser, and James A. Greenslade

56 F.3d 72 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Marvin A. MCNATT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., Richard A. Graser, and James A. Greenslade, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-56381. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 3, 1995. Decided May 16, 1995. MEMORANDUM ** Before: McKAY, * REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 Marvin McNatt appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of his former employer Allied-Signal, Inc. ("Allied") and his former supervisors Richard Graser and James Greenslade. McNatt alleges numerous violations of California law arising from his employment with and termination by Allied. The district court concluded that it had jurisdiction over this action and granted summary judgment to the defendants. We affirm on all counts except the one that relates to the alleged breach of the F20 sales commission contract (count four). McNatt has raised a triable issue of material fact…