United States v. Saul Carrillo-Colorado

Good Law
56 F.3d 73·1995 WL 309344
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 199594-30342California1,188 words

Opinion

Opinion

56 F.3d 73 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Saul CARRILLO-COLORADO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30342. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 19, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Saul Carrillo-Colorado appeals his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. Secs. 1326 (a) and (b)(1). Carrillo-Colorado contends that the district court erred first, by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea; second, by denying his request for presentence reports from unrelated defendants; and third, by not sua sponte finding vindictive prosecution. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Saul Carrillo-Colorado contends that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea because he was unfairly denied the benefit of changes in the government's plea…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.