In Re Steven G. Strowski Margaret H. Strowski, Dba Strowski Engineering, Debtors Steven G. Strowski v. City of Downey and Downey Police Department
Opinion
Opinion
56 F.3d 73 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Steven G. STROWSKI; Margaret H. Strowski, dba Strowski Engineering, Debtors Steven G. STROWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DOWNEY and Downey Police Department, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56198. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 2, 1995. * Decided May 5, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Steven G. Strowski appeals pro se the district court's order affirming an order of the bankruptcy court concerning the towing of Strowski's vehicle. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and vacate and remand. 3 We review a district court's decision on an appeal from a bankruptcy court de novo. Siragusa v. Siragusa (In re Siragusa), 27 F.3d 406, 407 (9th Cir. 1994). 4 Strowski brought an action in the bankruptcy court, alleging that defendants violated the automatic stay provisions of 11 U.S.C. Sec. 362 by towing his vehicle.…