United States v. Ernest C. Aldridge

56 F.3d 73 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest C. ALDRIDGE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10364. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 2, 1995. * Decided May 5, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ernest C. Aldridge appeals his two 2-month consecutive sentences of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of his term of probation. Aldridge contends the district court erred first, by originally imposing the sentence of probation against his objections, and second, imposing two consecutive terms of imprisonment upon revocation of probation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Aldridge was found guilty of two counts of criminal contempt for failure to appear at two hearings in violation of 18 U.S.C. 4 The existence of subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law reviewed de novo. Nike, Inc. v. Comercial Iberica…