Romaner J. Strong, Jr. v. Judicial Review Monterey Peninsula, Monterey Peninsula College Monterey Peninsula College

Good Law
56 F.3d 73·1995 WL 329624
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 1, 199593-16126California3,225 words

Opinion

Opinion

56 F.3d 73 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Romaner J. STRONG, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JUDICIAL REVIEW MONTEREY PENINSULA, Monterey Peninsula College; Monterey Peninsula College, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16126. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 16, 1995. Decided June 1, 1995. Before: REINHARDT, THOMPSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 Romaner J. Strong, Jr. brought an action in district court alleging that Monterey Peninsula College (the College) violated his civil rights and discriminated against him on the basis of race in the process of hiring its Instructor of Administration of Justice. His civil rights claims, asserted under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1981 , 1983, 1985 and 1988, were dismissed on statute of limitations grounds. After a jury trial on Strong's employment discrimination claim, asserted under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000 -e et seq., judgment was entered in favor of the College. Strong…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.