United States v. Glenn Demone Carr

Good Law
56 F.3d 73·1995 WL 329627
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 1, 199594-30284California1,684 words

Opinion

Opinion

56 F.3d 73 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glenn Demone CARR, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30284. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 4, 1995. Decided June 1, 1995. Before: BROWNING, REAVLEY, * and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Glenn Carr appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine base ("crack") with intent to distribute. We affirm. 3 Carr challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. In reviewing such a claim we determine whether, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Bishop, 959 F.2d 820, 829 (9th Cir. 1992). 4 The evidence supports the following events. Carr lived in Los Angeles. He and Lamont Geter visited Portland. They were arrested at a house during a drug bust. There had been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.