United Paperworkers Intern. Union, Local No. 30192 v. Riverside Cement Co.

Good Law
56 F.3d 73·1995 WL 330636
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 2, 199593-55584California2,268 words

Opinion

Opinion

56 F.3d 73 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED PAPERWORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL NO. 30192; Roy L. Puckett, Charlie L. Gordon; Bernardo Lugo; Darrel G. Pelc; Raul Olivas; Randel L. Grammer; Ronald D. Pelc, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. RIVERSIDE CEMENT COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-55584. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 1994. Decided June 2, 1995. Before: GIBSON, * HUG, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The United Paperworks International Union and various individual employees of Riverside Cement Company appeal the district court's grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Riverside in the employees' action to recover unpaid overtime wages pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act. We AFFIRM. I. BACKGROUND 3 Riverside Cement Company is a California-based firm engaged in the manufacture and distribution of cement. Due to declining demand, Riverside decided to temporarily cut production at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.