United States v. Stanley W. Akers, Jr., United States of America v. Gary Patrick Callahan

56 F.3d 73 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stanley W. AKERS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary Patrick CALLAHAN, Defendant-Appellee, Nos. 93-10325, 93-10399. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 12, 1994. * Decided May 22, 1995. Appeals from the United States District Court, for the District of Arizona, DC Nos. CR-89-00178-6-RGS, DC No. CR-89-00178-RGS; Roger G. Strand, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before: BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, and HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** I. Motion to withdraw as counsel 2 Akers' appointed counsel on appeal has filed a brief requesting leave to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief satisfies Anders' requirements. Counsel states that he has reviewed the record in Akers' case as well as the codefendants' files. Akers did not file a brief in response. 3 We…