United States v. Jeffrey Griffith Dings

56 F.3d 74 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Griffith DINGS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10280. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 11, 1995. Decided May 22, 1995. 1 Before: CUMMINGS * , SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Jeffrey Griffith Dings appeals his jury conviction for two counts of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 , 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(C). He contends that the district court erred in denying his motion for disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant, and that his conviction should be reversed either due to insufficiency of the evidence or due to the alleged late disclosure of impeachment evidence. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 4 * The denial of a motion to compel the disclosure of a confidential informant is reviewed for abuse of…