United States v. Richard Hans Norland

56 F.3d 74 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Hans NORLAND, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30282. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 19, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard Hans Norland appeals the restitution portion of the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 371 and 1343. Norland contends first, that his waiver in the plea agreement of the right to appeal did not apply to the order of restitution, and second, that the district court abused its discretion in ordering restitution in the amount of $89,705.90. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we dismiss the appeal. 3 Whether the appellant waived his statutory right to appeal is a matter of law we review de novo. United States v. Khaton, 40 F.3d 309, 311 (9th…