United States v. James D. Cox, Aka: James Cox, United States of America v. David Cox, United States of America v. Jeff Williams, United States of America v. Jacqueline Cox

Good Law
56 F.3d 74·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21340
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 4, 199593-50721California2,647 words

Opinion

Opinion

56 F.3d 74 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James D. COX, aka: James Cox, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David COX, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeff WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jacqueline COX, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-50721, 93-50723, 93-50725, 93-50726. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 10, 1995. Decided May 4, 1995. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Central District of California, D.C. No. CR 93-189 WDK(RS; William D. Keller, District Judge, Presiding. 2 C.D.Cal. 3 REVERSED IN PART, REMANDED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART. 4 Before: CANBY and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, KING, * District Judge. 5 MEMORANDUM ** 6 On March 3, 1993, David Cox, James Cox, Jacqueline Cox, and Jeff Williams were all indicted for conspiracy to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.