United States v. Georgette Lattimore

56 F.3d 74 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Georgette LATTIMORE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10497. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 19, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Georgette Lattimore appeals her sentence of 24 months imposed following revocation of her supervised release. Lattimore contends that when imposing her sentence, the district court failed to consider the sentencing disparity between her and other defendants with similar records who have been convicted of similar conduct as required by 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3553 (a)(6). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . After a de novo review, we affirm. See United States v. Lockard, 910 F.2d 542, 543-44 (9th Cir. 1990) (district court's application of a statute is reviewed de novo). 3 Before revoking a defendant's supervised release and…