United States v. Hector Medrano

56 F.3d 74 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector MEDRANO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50222. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 10, 1995. Decided May 11, 1995. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Hector Medrano was convicted of conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine, distribution of a listed precursor chemical, and distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 , 841(a)(1), and 846(d)(1). He now appeals his sentence imposed after this court reversed a possession count and remanded for resentencing. See United States v. Medrano, 5 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir. 1993). Medrano contends that the concurrent sentence violated double jeopardy principles because it was based on the same conduct that had already been considered as "relevant conduct" in the computation of his identical…