United States of America v. Malcolm Hepburn, - United States of America v. Robin Lucas

Good Law
56 F.3d 74·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21344
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 199593-10722California1,205 words

Opinion

Opinion

56 F.3d 74 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Malcolm HEPBURN, Defendant - Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Robin LUCAS, Defendant - Appellant. Nos. 93-10722, 93-10776. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 7, 1995. * Decided May 12, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Northern District of California, D.C. Nos. CR-92-00007-03-MHP, CR-92-0007-MHP; Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. DISMISSED IN NO. 93-10722; AFFIRMED IN NO. 93-10776. Before: BRUNETTI, THOMPSON and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Malcolm Hepburn and Robin Lucas were indicted, under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 371 , of conspiracy to fraudulently obtain monies for federally insured institutions and to unlawfully possess and use credit cards and checks stolen from the mail. Hepburn plead guilty on January 11, 1993, and Lucas was found guilty on July 1,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.