Michael Vadar v. Ron Angelone Albert Peralta George Weeks

Good Law
56 F.3d 75·1995 WL 325789·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21379
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 26, 199594-16444California662 words

Opinion

Opinion

56 F.3d 75 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael VADAR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ron ANGELONE; Albert Peralta; George Weeks, Defendants-Appellants. No. 94-16444. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 19, 1995. * Decided April 26, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action, Nevada state prisoner Michael Vadar alleged that Nevada state prison officials violated his due process rights by failing to credit his prison trust account with interest and by failing to post money to his trust account in a timely manner. The prison officials appeal the district court's summary judgment in favor of Vadar on his claim that he is entitled to interest on his prison trust account. We dismiss the appeal for lack of a final appealable order. 3 * Background 4 Vadar filed his complaint on April 14, 1993, and his amended complaint on November 5, 1993. In his amended complaint, Vadar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.