Wayne Construction, Inc. v. Monti Dean Lenard, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Mayhan Construction, Inc., John a Mayhan

Good Law
56 F.3d 75·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21412
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 199593-35886California1,801 words

Opinion

Opinion

56 F.3d 75 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. WAYNE CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff, v. Monti Dean LENARD, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, v. MAYHAN CONSTRUCTION, INC., John A Mayhan, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. CA 93-35886. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 1, 1994. Decided May 19, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the District of Alaska, No. DC. CV-91-00096 JWS; John W. Sedwick, District Judge, Presiding. D. Alaska REVERSED. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Monty Dean Lenard appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to the individual plaintiffs in this action for unpaid wages on the ground that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to entertain the claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we reverse. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 3 Lenard is an intervenor in this action initiated by Wayne Construction, Inc. Wayne alleged…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.