Camilo Antonio Vigil-Castillo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

56 F.3d 75 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Camilo Antonio VIGIL-CASTILLO Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-71030. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 14, 1995. Decided May 5, 1995. Appeal from an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, BIA No. Agj-bqu-gau. BIA PETITION GRANTED IN PART, PETITION DENIED IN PART. Before: TANG, SCHROEDER and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Camilo Antonio Vigil-Castillo, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' dismissal of his appeal from the Immigration Judge's denial of his request for suspension of deportation. He also petitions for review of the denial of his motion to remand pursuant to 8 C.F.R. Sec. 3.2. He contends first that the BIA abused its discretion in upholding the Immigration Judge's finding that there was insufficient evidence to establish extreme hardship on the record…