United States v. Yusuf D. Reeves

56 F.3d 75 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yusuf D. REEVES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30343. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 18, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Yusuf D. Reeves appeals the district court's revocation of his supervised release for violating the conditions of his release by possessing cocaine with the intent to distribute. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to establish that he possessed cocaine with the intent to distribute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 The district court may revoke a defendant's term of supervised release if it finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant violated a term of supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583 (e)(3); United States v. Lockard, 910 F.2d 542, 543 (9th Cir. 1990). 4 Here, Reeves…