Dagmar Urban v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
56 F.3d 75·1995 WL 314637·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21408
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 199593-70520California1,624 words

Opinion

Opinion

56 F.3d 75 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dagmar URBAN, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70520. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 13, 1995. Decided May 22, 1995. 1 Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, INS No. Aul-vqv-uhl. INS 2 DISMISSED. 3 Before: NORRIS, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges 4 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 5 Dagmar Urban, a native and citizen of West Germany, admitted she was deportable under Section 241(a)(2)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("the Act"), 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 (a)(2)(B) (Supp. 1994), because she had been convicted of selling methamphetamine. She requested a waiver of inadmissibility pursuant to Section 212(c) of the Act. 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (c). An Immigration Judge ("IJ") conducted a hearing on December 7, 1990, and denied her request. Urban appealed the IJ's ruling to the Board of Immigration Appeals…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.