Frank E. Voth v. Barbara Roberts, Governor, State of Oregon

56 F.3d 75 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank E. VOTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barbara ROBERTS, Governor, State of Oregon, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35526. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1995. * Decided May 19, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frank E. Voth, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action against Governor Barbara Roberts alleging that Roberts violated his due process and equal protection rights by failing to keep her promises to remedy the effects of discriminatory state court procedures. Voth also appeals the district court's denial of his motion for assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Dismissal 4 Voth contends that the district court erred by dismissing his amended complaint as frivolous because…