United States v. Jesus Rogelio Quezada-Rivera

Good Law
56 F.3d 75·1995 WL 317038·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21401
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 199594-10379California1,277 words

Opinion

Opinion

56 F.3d 75 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus Rogelio QUEZADA-RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10379. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 8, 1995. Decided May 23, 1995. Before: CUMMINGS, * SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jesus Rogelio Quezada-Rivera appeals the district court's denial of his suppression motion following his conditional guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). He contends the stop of the vehicle he was driving in a remote area of Southern Arizona was not supported by reasonable suspicion. We affirm. 3 At the hearing on the motion to suppress, U.S. Border Patrol Agent Betts testified as follows: At approximately 2:00 a.m., Border Patrol Agents received a radio dispatch that a sensor approximately 2 - 2 1/2 miles north of the border near Nogales, Arizona…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.