O'Gwin

O'Gwin v. United States

Good Law
90 F.2d 494·1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3862
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 7, 1937No. 8347California433 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Mathews, J.

Appellant was indicted for using the mails in furtherance of a scheme to defraud, in violation of section 215 of the Criminal Code ( 18 U.S.C.A. § 338 ). He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and to be imprisoned for one year. Thereafter he filed a motion to set aside or modify the judgment and sentence and a motion for a new trial, both of which were denied. This appeal followed.

Appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was not taken within the time allowed by the rules of practice and procedure prescribed by the Supreme Court on May 7, 1934, pursuant to the Act of February 24, 1933, c. 119, §§ 1-3, 47 Stat. 904 , as amended by the Act of March 8, 1934, c. 49, 48 Stat. 399 (28 U.S.C.A. § 723a). Rule 2 (28 U.S.C.A. following section 723a) provides:

“(1) Motions after verdict or finding of guilt, or to withdraw a plea of guilty, shall be determined promptly.

“(2) Save as provided in subdivision (3) of this Rule, motions . . . for a new trial, shall be made within three (3) days after verdict or finding of guilt.

“(3) A motion for a new trial solely upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence may be made within sixty (60) days .after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.