Aluminum Company Of America v. Bonneville Power Administration

Good Law
56 F.3d 1075·40 ERC (BNA) 2009·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 13435·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4045
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 1, 199593-70857California1,569 words

Opinion

Opinion

56 F.3d 1075 40 ERC 2009 , Util. L. Rep. P 14,050 ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA; Columbia Falls Aluminum Company; Elf Atochem North America; Intalco Aluminum Corporation; Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation; Northwest Aluminum Company; Oregon Metallurgical Corporation; Reynolds Metals Company; Vanalco, Inc., Petitioners, Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative; Public Power Council, Petitioners-Intervenors, v. BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. No. 93-70857. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 6, 1995. Decided June 1, 1995. James Buchal, Ball, Janik & Novack, Portland, OR, for petitioners. Ellen J. Durkee, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. Petition to Review a Decision of the Bonneville Power Administration. Before HALL, O'SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: 1 In this third of three related cases, 1 we must decide whether a federal agency, the Bonneville Power Administration, acted arbitrarily and capriciously in augmenting river flows as a means of benefitting the salmon. 2 2 * The factual background is largely set forth in the second of these related cases, Idaho Department of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.