Standish

Standish v. Gold Creek Mining Co.

Good Law
92 F.2d 662·1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4668
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 1937No. 8485California2,197 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Denman, J.

An able petition for rehearing points out that dictum in our opinion may be construed to assert that, if a suit be filed in a division or district other than that in which the defendant resides, the filing confers on the court no jurisdiction of the subject matter. The petition does not alter our decision, but the matters discussed are of sufficient importance to warrant clarification. The opinion is amended to read as follows:

. This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment dismissing an action at law for want of jurisdiction over the person of the defendant.

Plaintiff Standish, a citizen of Illinois, brought an action against Gold Creek Mining Company, a corporation of Montana, having its principal place of business at Deer Lodge, Powell county, in that state. The complaint included a count for the reasonable value of services rendered, amounting to more than $10,000, and one upon an account stated in the sum of $17,376.68.

Defendant then entered what was denominated a “special appearance,” moving the court to quash, vacate, and set aside the service of summons by reason of lack of jurisdiction over the person of the defendant. The ground assigned was that the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.