Milliken

Milliken v. McCauley

Good Law
93 F.2d 645·1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 2884
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 1937No. 8644California269 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Stephens, J.

Appellant is confined in the penitentiary of the State of Washington for a state offense, and appellee is the warden of such institution.

Appellant filed a petition in the United States District Court of Washington, Southern Division, directed to said warden, claiming that he was, and is, illegally imprisoned by reason of' an ex post facto application of a state statute. The court required the warden to show cause why the writ should not issue and thereafter rendered an opinion upon the merits, but also concluded the opinion with the holding that the facts did not bring the matter within 28 U.S.C.A. § 453 , and that therefore the court was without jurisdiction. The court denied the issuance of the writ and petitioner appealed to this court.

This short outline of the proceedings is given in order that our determination on the appeal may not be misunderstood. It appears from the record that there are numerous other inmates of the same institution who are vitally interested in the points made in appellant’s petition. Our ruling here is not intended to touch the merits of such points and should not be allowed to prejudice any other action appellant may be advised to take.

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.