Mills Alloys, Inc. v. Stoody Co.

Good Law
94 F.2d 413·36 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 287·1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4425
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 24, 1938No. 8313California4,285 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wilbur, J.

This is a patent infringement suit brought by the owner of letters patent 1,-803,875 to enjoin the use of the process therein described for surfacing the face of an oil well drill. The matter was referred to a special master over the objections of the appellants. The master found the patent claims involved to be valid and infringed. Exceptions were taken to the master’s report, and overruled. The master’s findings were sustained and adopted by the court, and an interlocutory injunction granted and an accounting ordered. From this interlocutory decree this appeal is taken.

The appellants attack the findings of validity and of infringement by appropriate assignments o-f error. The scope and character of the review of the findings of the special master is defined by the new Equity Rule 61%, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723, promulgated May 31, 1932, before the master’s report herein. The finding of fact and law are to be treated as presumptively correct, but subject to review by the trial court and by this court on appeal. Wilson-Western Sporting Goods Co. v. Barnhart, 9 Cir., 81 F.2d 108 ; Anraku v. General Electric Co., 9 Cir., 80 F.2d 958 ; Stewart-Warner Corp. v. Jiffy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.