Spalding

United States v. Spalding

Good Law
97 F.2d 701·21 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 568·1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4761
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 1938No. 8648California1,307 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Mathews, J.

For the year 1930, appellee, Silsby M. Spalding, paid an income tax of $132,146.32. Thereafter, pursuant to § 3226 of the Revised Statutes, as amended by § *702 1103(a) of the Revenue Act of 1932, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 1672-1673 , he claimed a refund of the entire amount of said tax, alleging that he had, in fact, no taxable net income in 1930. The claimed refund was granted to the extent of $4,404.27 only.

Thereafter, pursuant to § 3226, supra, and § 24(20) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41 (20), appellee brought suit against appellant, the United States, 1 for $40,608.57 of the unrefunded portion of the tax. The case was tried by the court without a jury, trial by jury having been expressly waived. The trial court filed a written opinion (D. C, 17 F.Supp. 966 ) and special findings of fact and thereupon entered judgment in appellee’s favor for $40,034.82. Appellant seeks reversal.

The trial court’s findings of fact are not challenged. The facts found are as follows :

On March 21, 1929, pursuant to § 4 of c. 303, Statutes of California, 1921, p. 405, as amended (Stats. 1929, p. 12; Deer-ing’s General Laws, 1931, Act 6341, p. 3456), the State of California granted ap-pellee a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.