Ex parte Hammond

Good Law
98 F.2d 794·1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3331
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 1938California225 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wilbur, J.

Petitioner having been denied his application for writ of habeas corpus by the United States District Court, applies for certificate of probable cause and the allowance of appeal therefrom.

Appellant is held under process of the state court for the crime of murder. He was sentenced to life imprisonment upon his plea of guilty. He complains that the statutory law of California requiring the court to determine the degree of guilt of defendant in such a case was not complied with. He applied for writ of habeas corpus to the District Court of Appeal for the Third District of California. That court held that the sentence was defective but not void and remanded the prisoner to the court in which he had pleaded ghilty for determination of the degree of guilt and for sentence. Ex parte Hammond, Cal.App., 74 P.2d 308 . He states that he appealed from this second sentence and that the judgment was affirmed by the District Court of Appeal for the Fourth District (People v. Hammond, 78 P. 2d 1172 ) and that a hearing was denied by the Supreme Court of California. As I have stated in the Matter of the Application of George Melendez, 98 F.2d 791 , the petitioner’s remedy lies with the Supreme…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.