William S. Gray & Co. v. Western Borax Co.

Good Law
99 F.2d 239·1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2845
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 10, 1938No. 8597California2,630 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Denman, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, appellee here, holding the plaintiff, appellant, not entitled to recover on a claimed breach of contract employing appellant as appellee’s exclusive United States agent for the sale of the latter’s borax products.

The contract contained the following arbitration' clause: “In case any dispute shall arise between the parties hereto as to the construction of any provision of this agreement, or as to the fulfillment hereof by either party thereto, -such dispute shall be submitted to three disinterested arbitrators, one.,to .be selected by each of the parties to this -agreement, and the third by the two -arbitrators so chosen, who shall render their decision in writing and serve a copy upon each of the parties hereto, and the same shall be-binding upon them' and conclusive as to the matter. in controversy.” ’ • '

•• Appellee demurred to the complaint' on. the- ground that the. court had no jurisdiction to proceed because, inter, alia it failed to- show the arbitration had been waived. Before decision the demurrer was withdrawn and the failure to arbitrate -prior to suit was waived by the stipulation for a reference to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.