United States v. Vinny Gilbert

Good Law
57 F.3d 709·1995 WL 353654·42 Fed. R. Serv. 574·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1901·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4458
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 199593-10308California1,206 words

Opinion

Opinion

ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed January 30, 1995 is redesignated as a per curiam opinion.

OPINION

Vincent Gilbert, following a jury trial, appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g). Gilbert contends the district court erred in permitting the government to introduce prior unsworn inconsistent statements of two of its witnesses for the purpose of impeachment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On August 10, 1992, Vincent (Vinny) Gilbert went to the trader home of his estranged wife, Christina (Tina) Gilbert, to dispute the payment of a utility bill. Vinny and Tina Gilbert formerly lived together in the trailer home, but upon their separation, James Michael Suddeth, Tina’s boyfriend, moved into the trailer home. Tina was visiting at a nearby trailer when she saw Vinny drive up in his van. She immediately called 911 because she was fearful Vinny would harm her. Extremely upset and screaming, Tina told the 911 operator that Vinny was going to beat her up, and that he had a gun to her boyfriend’s head.

Vinny, who was also extremely upset, entered Tina’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.