Dillingham Construction v. County of Sonoma

Good Law
57 F.3d 712·95 Daily Journal DAR 7313·19 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1409·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 13760·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4224
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 7, 199592-15247California5,181 words

Opinion

Opinion

57 F.3d 712 63 USLW 2779 , 130 Lab.Cas. P 57,917 , 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 1409 , 2 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1291 , Pens. Plan Guide P 23913H DILLINGHAM CONSTRUCTION N.A., INC., a California Corporation; Manuel J. Arceo, dba Sound Systems Media, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SONOMA; Division of Labor Standards Enforcement; Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Apprenticeship Standards, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15247. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 14, 1993. Decided June 7, 1995. Richard N. Hill, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff, Tichy & Mathiason, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. Ramon Yuen-Garcia, Dept. of Labor Standards Enforcement and John M. Rea, Dept. of Indus. Relations, San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before: CANBY, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges, and JONES, * District Judge. BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge: 1 The issue presented in this case is whether ERISA preempts the application of a state prevailing wage law that requires payment of prevailing wages to employees in apprenticeship programs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.