Reinharts, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.

Good Law
99 F.2d 648·40 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 44·1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2947
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 16, 1938No. 8798California955 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sure, J.

This is an equity case in which a final decree adjudged appellant had infringed a patent for a part of the mechanism of caterpillar tractors by the sale of two infringing tractors. 9 Cir., 85 F.2d 628 . It awarded no damages, but decreed costs against appellant. This appeal is from the allowance of the costs, upon a statement of the evidence under Equity Rule 75, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723 and an order incorporating the record in the ' former appeal No. 7636.

The contested items taxed are $7,056.-56 for models introduced by complainant as exhibits at the trial, and for $1423.80 for elaborate illustrative charts, both without previous authorization by the court.

The questions presented concern, first, the power of the court sitting in equity in a patent suit to award costs for models so introduced in evidence; second, its power with regard to the charts; and, third, whether if the costs for the models are allowable in exceptional cases, the court, in basing its allowance as upon such a case, exercised any legal discretion toward the defendant.

The appeal from the cost decree warrants our considering all three questions. Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co., 265 U.S. 78, 83, 85…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.