Pam Transport v. Freightliner Corporation

Good Law
57 F.3d 746·95 Daily Journal DAR 7393·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14263·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4301
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 199592-16059California633 words

Opinion

Opinion

57 F.3d 746 PAM TRANSPORT, an Arkansas corporation; Andrew Mertyris, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FREIGHTLINER CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; TRW Ross Gear, a division of TRW, Inc., an Ohio corporation; John Does I through X; Black Corporations I through X; White Partnerships I through X, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16059. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 1, 1993. Submission Withdrawn May 23, 1994. Resubmitted May 8, 1995. Decided June 9, 1995. 1 William G. Caravetta and Donald R. Wilson, Struckmeyer & Wilson, Phoenix, AZ, for plaintiffs-appellants. 2 Paul J. Mooney, E.J. Kotalik, Jr., Fennemore Craig and David C. Auther, Bowman & Brooke, Phoenix, AZ, for defendants-appellees. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. 4 Before: KOZINSKI and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, * District Judge. KELLEHER, District Judge: 5 PAM Transport and Andrew Mertyris appeal from the district court's order granting Freightliner Corporation's motion for judgment on the pleadings. Based on the response of the Arizona Supreme Court to our certified question, we affirm. 6 * On November 28, 1988,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.