Greenough

Mitchell v. Greenough

Good Law
100 F.2d 1006
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 16, 1939No. 8874California122 words

Lead Opinion

Wilbur, J.

In his petition for rehearing the appellant contends for the first time that the controlling statute of limitations is sec. 159, par. 2 of Remington’s Revised Statutes of Washington, which fixes a period of-three years, and claims that his action is brought within that period. A party cannot on petition for a rehearing shift his position. Marion Steam Shovel Co. v. Bertino, 8 Cir., 82 F.2d 945 ; Moss v. Sherburne, 1 Cir., 11 F.2d 579 ; Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Adams Grease Gun Corp., 2 Cir., 54 F.2d 285 .

In view of the fact that we adhere to our conclusion that the complaint does not state a cause of action it is unimportant whether the claim is barred.

Petition denied.