Robert Lewis Fultz v. United States Parole Commission

57 F.3d 1076 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert Lewis FULTZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-55184. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1995. * Decided June 9, 1995. 1 Before: BROWNING and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and JONES, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Robert Lewis Fultz appeals the district court's order dismissing with prejudice his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which challenged the United States Parole Commission's decision to revoke his special parole and to sentence him to 30 months imprisonment. Fultz contends that the Commission (1) relied on false information in revoking his special parole on a charge of battery; (2) violated due process in revoking special parole on grounds of excessive alcohol use and failure to participate in alcohol abuse aftercare; (3) failed to give him written notice of the charges and potential penalties if found guilty…